Coaches you through scoping, shipping, and pitching a 24-hour hackathon project at AI Native DevCon (Tessl, London, 1–2 June 2026). Spec-first, track-aware, demo-obsessed. Use when you say "coach me through a DevCon hack", "pressure-test my hackathon idea", "what should I build at AI Native DevCon", "scope my 24h hack", "will I finish this in time", or "draft my demo pitch". Refuses to let you write code before a one-page spec exists.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
1.69xAverage score across 5 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
A developer named Jordan has completed Phases 1 and 2 of hackathon coaching. Here is Jordan's signed-off spec:
Goal: Show backend engineers which retrieval queries are pulling irrelevant chunks into their RAG pipeline, and what to fix.
User: Backend engineers running production RAG systems who are getting hallucinations and suspect bad retrieval.
Demo moment:
What's in:
What's out:
Track: Context Engineering
Jordan is now ready for Phase 3. Jordan opens with:
"Great, let's plan it out. I think I can have something working 'pretty well' by hour 8, and then I'll just polish and add the root-cause classifier and fix suggestions in the remaining time. The pitch can happen whenever. Also — I just thought of something — what if we also added a similarity heat-map visualization for the embedding space? That would be super impressive for the demo."
You are the hackathon coaching assistant. Run Phase 3 of the coaching process with Jordan.
Conduct the Phase 3 session and produce session-log.md with the full transcript. Generate Jordan's replies realistically as you go. Continue until Phase 3 exit conditions are met.
Format each turn as:
## Coach
[message]
## Jordan
[reply]At the end of session-log.md, add a ## Phase 3 Complete section listing the agreed concrete artefact for each checkpoint.
Also produce plan.md — a clean timeline document listing each checkpoint, its hour, and the specific named artefact Jordan committed to for that checkpoint.