Analysis toolkit for agentic context management research. Triage papers and tools into structured reference summaries and REVIEWED.md entries following the agentic-context repo conventions.
93
93%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Used when promoting a paper from REVIEWED.md to a standalone deep dive (ANALYSIS-arxiv-<id>-<slug>.md).
title: "Analysis — <Paper Short Name> (<FirstAuthorYYYY>)"
date: YYYY-MM-DD
type: analysis
paper:
id: "arxiv:XXXX.XXXXX"
title: "<Full paper title>"
authors: [...]
year: YYYY
venue: "<arXiv / conference / journal>"
links: [...]
artifacts:
pdf: "references/papers/<paper-id>.pdf"
text: "references/papers/<paper-id>.md"
source:
- "references/<paper-reference-summary>.md"1.1 Problem statement
1.2 Core approach
1.3 Context representation and data model
1.4 Injection path (inputs → selection → gating → assembly)
1.5 Compression / summarisation path (trigger → method → fidelity → output)
1.6 Eviction / truncation policy (overflow → eviction order → recovery)
1.7 What the paper explicitly does not cover
2.1 Evaluation setup (as reported)
2.2 Main results (as reported)
2.3 Strengths
2.4 Limitations / open questions
2.5 Reproducibility
3.1 Comparison to adjacent work
3.2 Mapping to repo themes (compression / tiered loading / token budgeting / injection / benchmarking)
3.3 Concrete takeaways (actionable)