Complete azure-pipelines toolkit with generation and validation capabilities
97
97%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
{
"context": "Tests that the agent validates both the entry-point and the template file, detects the unversioned task (PublishBuildArtifacts missing @N), the conditional insertion indentation error in the template, and explains why entry-point-only validation would miss these issues.",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "Unversioned PublishBuildArtifacts task detected",
"description": "template-validation-report.md (or equivalent) flags `task: PublishBuildArtifacts` in the template as lacking a version suffix (should be PublishBuildArtifacts@2 or similar)",
"max_score": 20
},
{
"name": "Conditional insertion indentation error detected",
"description": "template-validation-report.md identifies the `${{ if ... }}:` block — the list items under it must be indented one level deeper than the `- ${{ if ... }}:` line; a misalignment here causes the conditional step to be skipped or the YAML to parse incorrectly",
"max_score": 20
},
{
"name": "Error file attribution correct",
"description": "template-validation-report.md correctly attributes each error to templates/build-stage.yml (not to azure-pipelines.yml)",
"max_score": 15
},
{
"name": "Entry-point-only limitation explained",
"description": "template-validation-report.md includes an explanation of why validating only azure-pipelines.yml would not surface these template errors",
"max_score": 15
},
{
"name": "Task version corrected in output template",
"description": "In the corrected templates/build-stage.yml, PublishBuildArtifacts is replaced with a versioned form (e.g., PublishBuildArtifacts@2)",
"max_score": 15
},
{
"name": "Corrected template file produced",
"description": "A corrected version of templates/build-stage.yml is produced (not just a report), with the identified issues fixed",
"max_score": 15
}
]
}