Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered decision-routing skill: lean, highly actionable, and sequenced with validation checkpoints. Its one real defect is that all six referenced handoff-template files are missing, which breaks the otherwise good progressive-disclosure structure.
Suggestions
Create the six referenced handoff-template files under references/ (e.g. frame-problem-to-brainstorm-llm.md, frame-problem-to-probe-llm.md); every link in the References section currently points to a file absent from the bundle, breaking navigation.
Consolidate the duplicate 'LLM bias toward Complicated' warning — it appears in both Step 0 ('LLM bias warning') and the Anti-Patterns section — into one location to remove the redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; the only minor redundancy is the 'bias toward Complicated' warning appearing in both Step 0 and Anti-Patterns, which reads as deliberate reinforcement of a critical guardrail. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully actionable for an instruction/routing skill: concrete triangulation questions (T1/T2/T3) with answer-to-domain mappings, an exact domain→verb→skill routing table, and copy-ready output templates with structured formats. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 0→1→1.5→2→3 process with explicit validation checkpoints (Adjacent Domain Challenge, 'Confirm?') and a feedback loop for the AskUserQuestion empty-answer bug; no destructive/batch cap applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The References section signals six one-level-deep handoff templates with clear descriptions, but none of the referenced files exist in the bundle (the references/ directory is absent), so the navigation is broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |