Complete helm toolkit with generation and validation capabilities
94
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
A startup has been running their notification-service on Kubernetes using raw YAML manifests managed by kubectl. They have decided to adopt Helm so they can version the chart, parameterise environment differences, and share it with other teams. The raw manifests are provided below.
The existing manifests have several issues that the migration should fix: image tags are hardcoded, all resource names are hardcoded strings, there are no labels following Kubernetes recommended conventions, and no resource limits are set. The migration should produce a proper Helm chart that addresses these issues.
Additionally, the team wants a simple shell script validate.sh that documents their intended validation workflow for the chart — covering both static linting and rendered manifest checking.
Produce:
notification-service/ with standard chart files including _helpers.tpl.validate.sh script at the repo root that shows the team's chart validation steps.The following files are provided as inputs. Extract them before beginning.
=============== FILE: inputs/deployment.yaml =============== apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: notification-service labels: app: notification-service spec: replicas: 2 selector: matchLabels: app: notification-service template: metadata: labels: app: notification-service spec: containers: - name: notification-service image: company/notification-service:v3.0.1 ports: - containerPort: 8080 env: - name: LOG_LEVEL value: "info" - name: SMTP_PASSWORD value: "hardcoded-secret-do-not-use"
=============== FILE: inputs/service.yaml =============== apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: notification-service spec: selector: app: notification-service ports: