The skill has a clear, well-checkpointed workflow and avoids explaining basic concepts, but it is somewhat verbose and its key formatting guidance is offloaded to a reference file that is missing from the bundle.

Suggestions

Add the missing reference.md to the bundle (or inline the section-mapping, report-structure, error-message, and formatting rules into SKILL.md) so the deferred guidance is actually available.

Trim the Philosophy section and consolidate the When to Use / When Not to Use / Anti-Patterns lists into a tighter form to reduce token overhead.

Inline the essential resume-report formatting rules directly in the body so the skill is fully actionable without relying on the absent reference.md.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient procedural guidance without explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the Philosophy section and the verbose When to Use / When Not to Use / Anti-Patterns lists with lengthy 'Why' rationales could be tightened, matching the score-2 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than the lean score-3 anchor.	2 / 3
Actionability	It provides concrete commands and paths (e.g. 'rtk ls -t .context/session/CONTEXT-*llm.md') but the core report-formatting and section-mapping rules are deferred to a reference.md that is not present, leaving key details incomplete per the score-2 anchor.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Phases 1-3 are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints — done/ fallback, AskUserQuestion stream selection, and the empty-answer feedback loop (detect -> numbered text fallback -> wait) — matching the score-3 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The reference to reference.md is well-signaled and one level deep (good intent), but reference.md is absent from the bundle, so navigation is broken and the deferred content is unavailable; this falls short of the score-3 'easy navigation' anchor and sits at score-2.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

90%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-crafted description that clearly answers both 'what' and 'when' with natural, distinctive trigger phrases and third-person voice. The only gap is that it states a single action rather than enumerating multiple specific capabilities.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain and one concrete action ('Resume session from CONTEXT-llm.md') but does not enumerate multiple distinct concrete actions, matching the score-2 anchor rather than the score-3 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.	2 / 3
Completeness	It explicitly states both what it does ('Resume session from CONTEXT-llm.md') and when to use it with an explicit 'Use when...' clause plus enumerated triggers, satisfying the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	It provides strong coverage of natural phrases a user would say — 'load context', 'resume session', 'continue where I left off' — matching the score-3 'good coverage of natural terms' anchor.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The CONTEXT-llm.md session-loading niche with distinctive triggers ('load context', 'resume session') is unlikely to overlap with other skills, matching the score-3 clear-niche anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

81%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 1 missing	Warning

	Total	13 / 16 Passed

Reviewed

about 2 months ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation