Audit and improve skill collections with an 8-dimension scoring framework, duplication detection, remediation planning, and CI quality gates; use when evaluating skill quality, generating remediation plans, validating report format, or enforcing repository-wide skill artifact conventions.
Does it follow best practices?
Evaluation — 93%
↑ 1.33xAgent success when using this tile
Validation for skill structure
Requirements for achieving A-grade (≥108/120) on skill-judge evaluation. Use this as a checklist when creating or improving skills.
Minimum Score: 108/120 (90%)
Target Score: 114/120 (95%) for A+
Perfect Score: 120/120 (100%)
Requirements:
Checklist:
Requirements:
Checklist:
Requirements:
Checklist:
Requirements:
Checklist:
Requirements:
Checklist:
Requirements:
Checklist:
Requirements:
Checklist:
Requirements:
Checklist:
skill-name/
├── SKILL.md (60-90 lines)
├── AGENTS.md
└── references/
├── category-topic1.md
└── category-topic2.mdskill-name/
├── SKILL.md (100-250 lines)
└── AGENTS.md (optional)50% tutorial content
500 lines in single file
# Check line count
wc -l skills/*/SKILL.md
# Verify frontmatter
head -10 skills/*/SKILL.md | grep -A5 "^---"
# Check for references directory
ls -la skills/*/references/
# Count keywords in description
grep "^description:" skills/*/SKILL.md | wc -wframework-skill-judge-dimensions.md - Dimension definitionsframework-scoring-rubric.md - Scoring methodologyInstall with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i pantheon-ai/skill-quality-auditorevals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
references
scripts