Name: pantheon-ai/software-design-principles
Rating: 96.6 (1 reviews)
Author: pantheon-ai

pantheon-ai/software-design-principles

Apply software design principles across architecture and implementation using deterministic decision workflows, SOLID checks, structural patterns, and anti-pattern detection; use when reviewing designs, refactoring modules, or resolving maintainability and coupling risks.

1.01x

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.01x

Average score across 7 eval scenarios

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Evaluation results

93%

Code Review: E-Commerce Order Service

Apply SOLID principles for code review

Criteria

Without context

With context

Classifies decision type

100%

Checks SRP compliance

100%

Checks OCP compliance

90%

100%

Checks LSP compliance

80%

Checks ISP compliance

90%

Checks DIP compliance

100%

Detects god class anti-pattern

100%

Detects hardcoded secrets

57%

42%

Detects bypassed interfaces

100%

Documents with BAD/GOOD format

100%

Documents tradeoffs

100%

Checks TypeScript strictness

100%

98%

-2%

Architecture Decision: Notification Service

Architecture decision for new microservice

Criteria

Without context

With context

Classifies decision type

100%

Checks dependency direction

100%

Avoids circular dependencies

100%

Clear interface ownership

100%

Entity purity

100%

Uses ADR format

100%

86%

Documents alternatives

100%

Documents risks

100%

Includes validation step

100%

Refactoring: UserManagement Service

Refactoring legacy monolithic code

Criteria

Without context

With context

Classifies decision type

100%

Applies SRP

100%

Applies OCP

100%

Applies DIP

100%

Avoids god class

100%

Evaluates pattern necessity

100%

Documents tradeoffs

100%

Does not premature optimize

100%

Uses BAD/GOOD format

100%

Includes validation

87%

100%

Interface Design: Payment Provider Integration

Interface design for external integrations

Criteria

Without context

With context

Applies DIP

100%

Applies ISP

100%

Clear interface ownership

100%

Avoids concrete coupling

100%

Uses dependency injection

100%

Documents tradeoffs

100%

Includes validation step

100%

Feature Design: Product Review System

Avoiding YAGNI violations in new feature design

Criteria

Without context

With context

Classifies decision type

100%

Applies design workflow

100%

Avoids YAGNI violation

100%

Solves current need

100%

Plans for refactoring

100%

Documents tradeoffs

100%

Applies SOLID where relevant

70%

100%

Includes validation step

100%

Design Review: Domain Model Refactoring

rich entities

Criteria

Without context

With context

Classifies design decision type correctly

100%

Identifies anemic domain model anti-pattern

100%

Identifies scattered business logic in services

100%

Recommends rich entity refactoring

100%

Uses BAD/GOOD format for recommendations

100%

Documents tradeoffs of rich entities

100%

Proposes concrete entity methods for business rules

100%

Architecture Decision: Message Queue vs Direct API Calls

architecture documentation

Criteria

Without context

With context

Classifies as architectural decision

100%

Uses proper ADR format

100%

Documents alternatives with rationale

100%

Explains chosen decision clearly

100%

Documents risks and mitigation

100%

Includes validation steps

100%

Applies architectural dependency checks

100%

Evaluated: about 2 months ago
Agent: Claude Code
Model: Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Code Review: E-Commerce Order Service Architecture Decision: Notification Service Refactoring: UserManagement Service Interface Design: Payment Provider Integration Feature Design: Product Review System Design Review: Domain Model Refactoring Architecture Decision: Message Queue vs Direct API Calls