Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a competently structured overview with concrete commands, guardrails (When NOT to Use, anti-patterns), and explicit validation checkpoints, but it has minor redundancy with the description, two vaguely-specified workflow steps, no spelled-out error-recovery loop, and references that point to bundle files not present in the skill.
Suggestions
Make workflow steps 2–3 concrete: give a command or selection heuristic for picking representative component files and a grep pattern for dark-mode/ARIA (e.g. `prefers-color-scheme`, `aria-`) — this raises actionability.
Add an explicit error-recovery feedback loop after each validation step (e.g. "if the scratchpad or schema validation reports gaps/errors, fix them and re-run validation before generating docs") — this raises workflow_clarity.
Ship the referenced bundle files (references/*.md, templates/skill-output.yaml, schemas/design-reference.schema.json) alongside SKILL.md so the well-signaled references actually resolve — this raises progressive_disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and avoids teaching basics Claude already knows, but the "When to Use" list duplicates the description's triggers and some Mindset/anti-pattern prose could be tightened; not a 3 because not every token earns its place, not a 1 because it is not padded with known concepts. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (grep for custom properties, `bun run generate`/`validate`) and BAD/GOOD tables, but steps 2–3 ("inspect existing components", "check dark mode and accessibility patterns") are vague and the full 8-step detail is offloaded to a referenced file; not a 3 because guidance is incomplete, not a 1 because real commands are present. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (scratchpad review with a TBD/null grep, schema validation, structured report), but no explicit error-recovery feedback loop (e.g. "if validation fails, fix and re-validate") is spelled out; not a 3 because the anchor-3 error-recovery loop is only implicit, not a 1 because the sequence and checkpoints are clear. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview with a well-signaled, one-level-deep References section, but none of the referenced bundle files (references/*.md, templates/skill-output.yaml, schemas/design-reference.schema.json) actually exist in the provided skill, so the navigation is broken in practice; not a 3 because the disclosure cannot be exercised, not a 1 because the written structure itself is well organized. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |