putio/frontend-repos
Structure frontend repositories around a shared verify and delivery model. Use when standardizing package repos, app repos, or SDK repos across TypeScript, Swift, Kotlin, or similar ecosystems; setting up CI guardrails; defining a repo-local verify command; or enabling continuous publish or deploy flows on main after verify passes.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It provides specific concrete actions, includes natural trigger terms spanning multiple ecosystems, explicitly addresses both what and when with a 'Use when' clause, and carves out a clear niche with both positive triggers and a negative boundary ('Skip...'). The description is concise yet comprehensive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: standardizing package/app/SDK repos, defining verify commands for CI, aligning publish/deploy flows on main, fixing repo shape that blocks repeatable release/deployment. These are concrete, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (structure put.io frontend-owned repositories around verify and delivery contracts) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause with multiple trigger scenarios, plus a 'Skip' clause defining negative boundaries). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'package repos', 'app repos', 'SDK repos', 'TypeScript', 'Swift', 'Kotlin', 'verify command', 'CI', 'publish/deploy flows', 'repo shape', 'release', 'deployment'. Good coverage of ecosystem-specific and workflow-specific terms. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive: scoped specifically to put.io frontend-owned repositories, repo-local verify/delivery contracts, and specific ecosystems. The 'Skip generic CI/CD design that does not depend on repo structure' clause further sharpens boundaries and reduces conflict risk. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently communicates a repo standardization workflow. It excels at providing concrete, executable guidance (inspection commands, JSON/YAML examples) while maintaining a clear multi-step workflow with proper validation gates. The progressive disclosure to ecosystem-specific references is well-structured and conditionally signaled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient. It avoids explaining what CI/CD is, what semantic-release does, or how GitHub Actions work. Every section earns its place: workflow steps, inspection commands, concrete examples, and guardrails. No padding or unnecessary context. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable inspection commands (rg, jq, find), concrete package.json and GitHub Actions YAML examples that are copy-paste ready, and a structured summary template. The workflow steps are specific and directive rather than abstract. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 10-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: step 7 requires running verify locally and fixing until it passes before proceeding, step 9 gates publish/deploy on stable verify, and step 10 adds a smoke check with gap recording. This provides proper feedback loops for a potentially destructive delivery pipeline change. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill clearly signals four bundled reference files (delivery-model.md, typescript.md, applications.md, secrets.md) with conditional reading instructions (e.g., 'If the repo is TypeScript, read...'). References are one level deep and well-organized. The main file stays as an overview with workflow and examples while deferring ecosystem-specific details to references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents