saif-shines/journey-sidebar-labels
Shape documentation sidebar labels and group order so navigation follows a clear developer journey — modeled on Scalekit Full stack auth and journey-focused docs standards.
63
79%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description is strong on specificity and distinctiveness, clearly defining a narrow task around documentation sidebar design with concrete conventions and a reference model. However, it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which caps completeness, and the trigger terms lean toward specialized vocabulary rather than natural user language.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to reorganize, audit, or improve documentation sidebar navigation, menu labels, or docs structure.'
Include more natural trigger terms users might say, such as 'docs navigation', 'table of contents', 'menu structure', 'information architecture', or 'docs sidebar'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: audit sidebar labels, design section order, enforce concise labels, sentence case, phase-aligned groups. Also references a specific model (Scalekit developer-docs). | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'what' is well-covered (audit and design sidebar labels and section order with specific conventions), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance telling Claude when to select this skill. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Contains relevant terms like 'sidebar labels', 'section order', 'navigation', 'developer journey', 'documentation', and 'sentence case', but misses common user phrasings like 'docs nav', 'table of contents', 'menu structure', or 'information architecture'. The terms are somewhat specialized. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche — documentation sidebar navigation design with a named reference model (Scalekit developer-docs). Unlikely to conflict with other skills due to the narrow focus on sidebar label auditing and developer journey alignment. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, actionable skill for sidebar auditing with clear rules, a logical diagnostic workflow, and a concrete output format. Its main weaknesses are a referenced file (`references/fsa-sidebar-journey.json`) that doesn't exist in the bundle, and some minor verbosity in explanatory passages that Claude doesn't need. The label rules table and journey phases model are particularly strong and immediately usable.
Suggestions
Include the referenced `references/fsa-sidebar-journey.json` file in the bundle, or inline a minimal example of the Full Stack Auth sidebar structure directly in the skill to make the reference model self-contained.
Trim parenthetical explanations in the journey phases list (e.g., '(after sign-in exists)') — Claude can infer dependency ordering from the phase sequence itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary elaboration. The 'Core principle' metaphor and some explanatory text (e.g., 'what the reader does or what they configure') could be trimmed. The journey phases section is well-structured but slightly verbose in its parenthetical explanations. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides highly concrete, actionable guidance: specific label rules in a table, an 8-phase journey model with clear descriptions, a 5-step diagnostic process, and a defined output format (table + summary paragraph). The example prompts and output template make it copy-paste ready for real audits. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step diagnostic process is clearly sequenced and logically ordered (list labels → flag bad ordering → check specificity → align quickstarts → check leaf vs page titles). For this type of non-destructive audit/recommendation skill, validation checkpoints aren't critical, and the workflow is unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references `references/fsa-sidebar-journey.json` twice as a checklist/structured reference, but no bundle files are provided, meaning this reference is unresolvable. The content itself is well-organized with clear sections, but the missing reference file undermines the progressive disclosure structure. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents