CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

simon/skills

Auto-generated tile from GitHub (10 skills)

92

1.16x
Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

92%

1.16x

Average score across 44 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

criteria.jsonevals/scenario-43/

{
  "context": "Tests whether the agent follows the Diátaxis tutorial conventions when writing a getting-started guide for new users of a software library. Focuses on title style, structural completeness, step-level verifiable results, and keeping the document free of conceptual digressions.",
  "type": "weighted_checklist",
  "checklist": [
    {
      "name": "Verb-based title",
      "description": "The tutorial document title starts with an action verb (e.g., 'Build', 'Create', 'Set up', 'Write', 'Deploy') rather than a noun phrase or 'How to...'",
      "max_score": 12
    },
    {
      "name": "Goal/intro statement",
      "description": "The document opens with a clear statement of what the reader will accomplish by the end of the tutorial",
      "max_score": 8
    },
    {
      "name": "Prerequisites section",
      "description": "The document includes an explicit prerequisites or requirements section listing what the reader needs before starting",
      "max_score": 10
    },
    {
      "name": "Numbered steps",
      "description": "The tutorial body uses a numbered (ordered) list for the main steps, not bullet points or prose paragraphs",
      "max_score": 10
    },
    {
      "name": "Verifiable result per step",
      "description": "At least two-thirds of the numbered steps include an explicit verifiable or visible result (something the reader can run, see, check, or confirm)",
      "max_score": 20
    },
    {
      "name": "Minimal explanation in steps",
      "description": "Steps contain primarily instructions/commands rather than conceptual explanations — no step has a longer explanatory paragraph than the action it describes",
      "max_score": 15
    },
    {
      "name": "Final outcome statement",
      "description": "The document ends with a summary or statement of the final outcome the reader has achieved",
      "max_score": 8
    },
    {
      "name": "No reference tables mixed in",
      "description": "The document does NOT include parameter/option reference tables or API specification sections (stays a single doc type)",
      "max_score": 9
    },
    {
      "name": "No conceptual digression sections",
      "description": "The document does NOT contain standalone 'Background', 'Why this works', or 'Understanding X' sections (those belong in an explanation doc)",
      "max_score": 8
    }
  ]
}

evals

README.md

tile.json