Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured process skill with a clear multi-phase workflow, explicit constraints, and thoughtful guardrails for token efficiency. Its main weaknesses are moderate redundancy (constraints repeated across sections), lack of executable/concrete examples (no actual code, tool calls, or copy-paste templates), and a monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting detailed reference material into separate files.
Suggestions
Provide a concrete, copy-paste-ready evidence packet template file (e.g., as a markdown code block or referenced EP-template.md) rather than describing the format in prose twice.
Add an executable example of sub-agent invocation showing the actual tool call pattern and a sample returned output, rather than only describing the schema in bullets.
Extract the folder structure, naming conventions, and evidence packet schema into a referenced REFERENCE.md file to reduce the main skill's length and practice the progressive disclosure the skill advocates.
Remove the redundant restatement of research mode constraints in Phase 2 since they are already captured in the 'Key Constraints at a Glance' table.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably well-structured but includes some redundancy—key constraints are stated in the table and then repeated in Phase 2, evidence packet schema appears both in Phase 4 and in a standalone section, and some explanatory text (e.g., 'This skill acts as your writing partner') is unnecessary padding. It could be tightened by ~30% without losing information. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete schemas, folder structures, naming conventions, and a strict output format for sub-agents, which is good. However, there is no executable code or copy-paste-ready commands—everything is described in prose/bullet form. The sub-agent invocation pattern is described conceptually but not with actual tool calls or concrete implementation examples. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced across well-labeled phases (0–6) with an overview summary. It includes explicit stop conditions, no-source fallback handling, an escalation ladder for when evidence can't be found, and a merge rule for sub-agent outputs. The escalation ladder in the guardrails section serves as a feedback loop for blocked research paths. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear sections and headers, but it's entirely monolithic—everything lives in a single file with no references to supporting files. The folder structure section and evidence packet template could be split into referenced files. Given no bundle files exist, the skill misses an opportunity to practice the progressive disclosure it preaches. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |