CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

chinese-indie-dev

处理 1c7/chinese-independent-developer 仓库的项目提交。 检查 issue #160 新评论、新开的 Issue、新开的 PR, 将有效项目添加到对应 README,关闭垃圾内容。 当用户要求“收录项目”“处理提交”“处理 issue”“跑一下列表”或运行中国独立开发者列表维护流程时使用。

69

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exceptionally actionable and well-sequenced operational skill with strong validation/feedback loops for its destructive and batch operations. Its main weaknesses are noticeable repetition of the same warnings across sections and a monolithic single-file structure with no progressive disclosure for a body of this length.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated critical warnings (format-as-rejection ban, signature POST/PATCH/GET verification, no-manual-transcription rule) into one authoritative section and reference it rather than restating each verbatim in 检查一/二/三 and the intro.

Extract the detailed conflict-resolution scripts and historical incident log (#1205, #1206, #1208, #1220-#1227, #1225) into a separate reference file (e.g. references/conflict-handling.md) and point to it from the main flow, since the skill is far longer than the ~50-line simple-skill threshold.

Pull the lengthy 步骤1 格式规范 rules into a references/formatting.md file so the main SKILL.md body stays a navigable overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

It assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept padding) and all content is genuine domain-specific operational knowledge Claude lacks, but several critical warnings (format-rejection ban, signature PATCH/verify, manual-transcription prohibition) are restated verbatim across multiple sections and could be consolidated.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready bash throughout — gh api/jq pipelines, git merge --no-ff, gh pr merge --squash, the POST/PATCH/GET comment flow, and the retry-and-verify signature scan loop — covering the common cases, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (预检→检查一/二/三→身份判断→通用流程步骤1-3→最后一步→收尾扫描) with explicit validation checkpoints (POST→PATCH→GET per comment, unconditional final re-scan to zero residual, verify README before push) and feedback loops for error recovery; the batch/destructive operations all carry the required validation so the score-3 cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Has good internal section structure, but as a ~400-line single-file skill with no bundle files, all detailed material (historical incident logs, format rules, multi-branch conflict-resolution scripts) is inlined with no one-level-deep references to split it out.

3 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A highly specific, well-targeted description that clearly states both the concrete actions performed and explicit trigger conditions, with natural user-facing keywords. Minor room for additional synonym/extension coverage in trigger terms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions covering the full task: '检查 issue #160 新评论、新开的 Issue、新开的 PR', '将有效项目添加到对应 README', '关闭垃圾内容' — comprehensive coverage, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' (process submissions, check comments/issues/PRs, add to README, close spam) and explicitly answers 'when' with '当用户要求…时使用' plus concrete trigger phrases, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes several natural phrases a user would actually say ('收录项目''处理提交''处理 issue''跑一下列表') with good coverage, but is missing some common synonyms and file-extension variants that would push it to a 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a single named repo (1c7/chinese-independent-developer) with a distinct maintenance niche and specific trigger phrases, giving minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 6 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
1c7/chinese-independent-developer
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.