Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-structured, and points clearly to the right files and validation commands. Its main gap is the lack of an explicit sequenced validation workflow and executable operation examples.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered workflow (make change -> run pnpm nx test electron-backend -> fix and re-run -> run targeted E2E if touched) to make the validation feedback loop explicit.
Include one executable code snippet showing how to emit a request-scoped DB_OPERATION_EVENT progress event, so the core rule is copy-paste ready.
Note when the architecture doc should be consulted first (e.g. 'Read docs/architecture/sqlite-db-worker.md before restructuring worker boundaries') to strengthen navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (ownership paths, rules, validation commands) earns its place and assumes competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present (copy-paste commands like 'pnpm nx test electron-backend' and 'IPTVNATOR_TRACE_DB=1', plus exact file paths), but the Rules section is directive rather than providing executable code examples for the operations themselves, so it is not fully copy-paste ready for the core work. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A dedicated Validation section provides explicit verification commands, but there is no sequenced make-change -> validate -> fix -> retry workflow with checkpoints, which the rubric expects for level 3 on database operations. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with clean sections (Ownership, Rules, Validation) and a single clearly signaled one-level reference to docs/architecture/sqlite-db-worker.md; no bundle files are needed, so the structure is well organized. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |