Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured policy skill that points Claude at exact source files and tokens and ends with concrete validation steps; the main gap is the absence of short executable SCSS usage snippets.
Suggestions
Add one or two short SCSS snippets illustrating canonical token usage and an app-region: no-drag example to lift actionability from concrete-guidance to copy-paste-ready.
Consider a brief numbered change workflow (locate partial -> extend vs copy -> run validation) to make the sequence explicit alongside the policy rules.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and policy-focused, assuming Claude's knowledge of SCSS, mixins, and Electron drag regions; only a few explanatory clauses (e.g., the barrel-vs-include-path note) could be trimmed, and they largely carry non-obvious project context. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete file paths, specific token names (--app-*, --app-selection-on-color, --mat-sys-*), and exact values (8px, app-region: no-drag), but provides no copy-paste code snippets showing typical usage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A dedicated Validation section supplies an explicit checkpoint (run the consumer's Nx lint/test/build target, inspect light/dark themes, hover/selected states, and drag/no-drag behavior); the overall flow is policy-organized rather than a numbered sequence, with only minor sequencing gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no bundle files, the body is cleanly divided into well-labeled sections (Canonical Sources, Token Boundary, Shared Layout Rules, Validation) that navigate easily without needing external references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |