Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, highly actionable overview with concrete examples, explicit gate exemptions, a validation command, and clean one-level-deep references. The only minor gap is the lack of an explicit validation-failure recovery loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense, assuming Claude's competence: no padding, no explanation of what a changelog is, and every line (format, type values, exemptions, verify command) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a copy-paste-ready frontmatter example with concrete values, enumerated `type` values, explicit exemption glob patterns, and an executable verify command (`pnpm run release:notes:validate`), covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Format / Skip or Label / Verify sections form a clear logical sequence with a concrete validation checkpoint, but there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop if validation fails, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (`Full format: .changes/README.md`, `Gate policy: tools/release/check-release-note-gate.mjs`) and no nested references, fitting the clear-overview anchor for a simple skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |