Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-sequenced, with specific paths, commands, endpoints, and validation steps that leave little ambiguity. Its weakest point is progressive disclosure — a long single-file skill with mild internal redundancy and no split-out reference materials.
Suggestions
Extract the 'Claw 最小模板' polling sequence and the file-path inventory into a separate reference file referenced one level deep, keeping SKILL.md as an overview.
Consolidate the overlapping底盘/runtime/service ordering currently repeated across '目标', '推荐工作流 §3', and '代码改动建议' into a single canonical sequence.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for the mutation/runtime test steps to make the verification path more concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the '目标', '推荐工作流 §3', and '代码改动建议' sections repeat the底盘/runtime/service ordering, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete file paths (e.g. 'src/server/public_query_builders.py'), named commands ('set_long_term_objective', 'create_avatar'), exact endpoints, and runnable test commands — copy-paste ready guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflows are clearly sequenced (priority ordering 1–7, pre-flight '首先检查什么' checklist) and the Claw template includes a query→check→branch→re-query verification loop with test commands as validation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but at ~180 lines everything is inline with no bundle reference files; content like the Claw template or the file-path inventory could be split into separate reference files for clearer navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |