Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable workflow with explicit validation and retry loops and concrete commands; its only weakness is minor verbosity in the defensive messages.po warning and the Phase 1 framing.
Suggestions
Tighten the messages.po guidance to one line, e.g. 'Do not edit or read any messages.po files — they are generated by build_mo.py.'
Move the Phase 1/Phase 2 context (which references an external skill) into a short dedicated note so the workflow steps stay focused.
Specify the expected working-directory assumption for the tools/ paths to avoid ambiguity when run from repo subfolders.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete commands, but the defensive messages.po warning ('不要去修改 messages.po 文件... 你不需要修改也不需要去阅读...') is repetitive, and the Phase 1 aside pads the opening. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands (`python tools/i18n/generate_missing_report.py`, `pytest tests/test_frontend_locales.py tests/test_backend_locales.py`, `python tools/i18n/build_mo.py`) and exact target paths (registry.json, .po/.json files). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 1–4 process with an explicit validation checkpoint and feedback loop: '运行 pytest...如果有缺失，重复步骤 3 直到全部通过'. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with no bundle files present; content is well organized into a numbered workflow and sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |