Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, mostly executable i18n guide that avoids over-explanation, but its workflows lack explicit validation/feedback steps for the batch build and extract operations, which is the main weakness.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint after build_mo.py (e.g. confirm the .mo files were generated and re-run on failure), and a syntax-check step for edited .po files, so the batch workflows have a feedback loop.
Consolidate the registry.json guidance and the build-script reminder so each rule appears once, reducing redundancy between the core-operations and critical-rules sections.
Expand the effects/JSON and character-info section with a concrete, copy-paste-ready example (a small JSON snippet using _desc/when_desc and a dict mapping) instead of the current terse description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and imperative with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the registry.json guidance and the build command are each restated, so a little could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Core flows are executable (build_mo.py, extract_csv.py, the t() import example, PO format), but the JSON _desc/when_desc and dict-key sections are sketchier and not fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are present (e.g. the 4-step CSV workflow) but there are no validation/verification checkpoints for the batch build/extract operations, which caps this dimension at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the self-contained body is well organized into clearly headed sections with no content that needs splitting out, though it sits just over the 50-line simple-skill threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |