Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean and actionable, giving ready-to-run commands for both stacks plus a useful change-to-test decision table. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: it lacks explicit validation feedback loops for the mandatory locale tests and batch operations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation feedback loop for locale tests, e.g. 'Run test_frontend_locales.py; if it fails, fix missing keys, then re-run until it passes.'
Add a brief setup prerequisite line (activate venv; install deps) so commands are executable from a clean state.
Clarify the post-change workflow sequence (run affected tests → run coverage → verify locale alignment) as a numbered checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is compact and assumes Claude's competence — it lists executable commands with brief inline comments and a tight guidance table, with only minor explanatory padding like '推荐在已激活虚拟环境的情况下执行'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste ready commands for both backend (pytest variants) and frontend (npm run test, type-check) plus a decision table, with only a minor gap (no explicit install/setup step). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Coverage guidance and locale-test mandates give a loose sequence after changes, but there is no explicit validate-then-fix feedback loop or checkpoint for the batch/locale tests, and the destructive/batch locale validation lacks a clear retry path. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (backend commands, frontend commands, coverage guide) with one external pointer (`.cursor/rules/testing.mdc`) and no nested references; the skill is short enough that the inline structure is appropriate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |