Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable audit methodology with concrete tool calls, a scoring framework, and a report template. Its main weaknesses are minor promotional padding around the ZIP export and the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop.
Suggestions
Trim the promotional ZIP-export language (the 'strongly recommended... for stakeholder sharing and tracking improvements' note and the redundant ZIP-contents note) to improve conciseness.
Add an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop for the audit (e.g., re-walkthrough after identifying a breakpoint to confirm the redesign resolves the friction) to raise workflow clarity.
Tighten abstract phase directives like 'provide a streamlined redesign approach' with a concrete template or criteria so the guidance is fully executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean methodology that assumes Claude's competence (no explaining of what Figma or cognitive load is), with only minor padding such as the promotional 'strongly recommended to download... for stakeholder sharing' note and the redundant ZIP-contents note that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable specifics — named tools with parameters (capture_screenshot(sendToLLM=true), download_current_chat_report_zip), exact placeholder syntax [[screenshot:N]], a numeric scoring rubric (base 80, -10/-5/-2), and a full report template — though a few phase directives like 'provide a streamlined redesign approach' remain somewhat abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced phases (Pre-Flight → Phase 1-4) with checkpoints (screenshot 'Verify result' step, 'Logic Integrity' breakpoint callout), but lacks an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop, keeping it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file methodology with clear section headers and no nested external references; appropriate as a self-contained skill, though at ~170 inline lines it slightly exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception that would merit a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |