Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-architected reference skill: token-efficient, structured around a clear owner-boundary table and concrete runtime rules, with a clean one-level-deep reference layout. The main gap is the absence of full executable code examples, which is partly mitigated by specific method-signature references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense: every line states a distinct rule or boundary with no padding and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., the Owner Boundaries table and Runtime Rules each earn their tokens). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, specific guidance via real API surfaces ("@agent.action_func", "agent.use_actions(...)", "create_execution(...)", ".validate(handler)", ".review(..., on_fail=\"warn\" | \"block\")", ".artifact(...)"), but provides no full copy-paste code blocks, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The execution lifecycle is laid out with explicit validation gates and terminal policies ("Final .validate(handler) is a hard output gate", ".review(...) is a soft assessment with an explicit terminal policy", ".artifact(...) requires verified TaskWorkspace readback"), giving a clear sequence with most checkpoints present, though it is organized as rules rather than a numbered workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Exemplary overview-to-reference structure: the "Read by Need" section maps each concern to a single one-level-deep reference file (agent-execution.md, actions-runtime.md, actions-execution-resource.md, helpers-and-services.md, devtools.md, devtools-review.md), all of which exist in ./references/, keeping the SKILL.md body a navigable index. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |