Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with extensive executable code and concrete package guidance, but it is a long monolithic body that repeats import listings and inlines detail that the signposted README references are meant to hold. Workflow clarity is solid on the happy path but lacks an explicit validation feedback loop for risky package moves.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop for package moves: after `pnpm turbo run build/lint --filter=@agenta/<package>`, state that failures must be fixed and re-run before pushing, mirroring the destructive-operation checkpoint pattern.
De-duplicate the import listings: the @agenta/* subpath imports appear in both the "Package overview"/README table region and the "Subpath imports" section — consolidate to one authoritative list to trim tokens.
Move the longer worked examples (full vitest config, Fern-mock test, molecule anti-patterns) into reference files under ./references and link to them one level deep, so SKILL.md stays a lean overview and progressive disclosure reaches the score-3 anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and mostly assumes Claude's competence, but the ~440-line single file repeats the same import listings several times (subpath imports, package overview, selection guide) and includes some justifying prose ("Why:", data-flow narration) that could be tightened, so it is mostly efficient but somewhat padded. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready code throughout — EnhancedModal usage, subpath imports, molecule useController/get/set examples, bridge selectors/actions, EntityPicker variants, and a full vitest config and mock example — all executable rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Placement and build verification are sequenced ("Verify your change builds AND lints before pushing" with explicit pnpm turbo commands), but the destructive/batch operations — package moves and hierarchy reordering that can break the build — lack a validate→fix→retry feedback loop, capping workflow clarity at 2 per the destructive-operation guideline. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It signals one-level-deep references ("Full documentation: web/packages/.../README.md") for molecules, bridges, and selection, but no bundle/reference files actually exist in ./references, ./scripts, or ./assets, so the bulk of detailed guidance is inlined in SKILL.md rather than appropriately split out, leaving structure present but not fully realized. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |