Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, actionable workflow with a concrete deliverable template and appropriate validation guidance. It is efficient and self-contained, with only minor redundancy between Step 4 and the outline's gaps section and slight conciseness padding.
Suggestions
Merge the Step 4 'Content Gaps' analysis into the outline's 'Content Gaps to Exploit' section to remove duplication, or explicitly state how Step 4 extends the in-outline gaps.
Tighten the description-clause repetition: the 'Skeleton only: structure, H2/H3 hierarchy...' line near restates the opening summary; consolidate into one statement of scope.
Add an explicit feedback loop to Step 5 (e.g., if the save path is unwritable or the directory cannot be created, surface the error and retry) to raise workflow_clarity toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete, non-redundant instructions, though the 'Skeleton only: structure...' clause restates the intro and the large outline template adds length; minor trimming possible. Not a 5 because of these small padded/restated passages, not a 3 because the body largely assumes Claude's competence without explaining basics. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, fill-in-able outline template with specific field prompts, word-count ranges, and a concrete save path 'outlines/[slug]-outline.md'. Instruction-only but actionable; minor gaps (no explicit handling of user-specified path conflicts) keep it from 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with verification (Step 5 confirms readiness for /blog write) and untrusted-data validation in Step 2. Not 5 because Step 4 'Content Gaps' partially duplicates the outline's gaps section and there is no explicit retry/feedback loop for the save step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained SKILL.md (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundles) organized into clear headed sections with the core deliverable template inline; no nested references. Not 5 only because some of the detailed outline template could conceptually live in a reference file, though for a single-purpose skill inline placement is defensible. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |