Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, executable research-loop contract with clear sequencing, explicit validation gates, and well-signaled references to detailed contracts. It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and keeps detailed material one reference deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no padding explaining what research or vaults are, and each line carries an instruction or a constraint that earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands ("python3 \"$CORE\" transaction inspect …", "transaction apply … --approved-plan-sha256 …") plus specific ledger states, file paths, and budget numbers covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences the process explicitly — contract, loop, assess evidence, file dossier, separate merge — with validation checkpoints (inspect before apply, approval SHA gate, "transaction recover" after interruption) appropriate for the destructive vault-write operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Acts as an overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (references/program.md is a real bundle file; ../wiki/references/provenance.md and operation-transactions.md are vault-side contracts), keeping the body a navigable map rather than a monolith. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |