Conciseness

The body is dense and operational with no basic-concept padding, but the 'Why execution stops here' section repeats boundary statements ('never run it merely because it was found', 'Never relabel configured as verified', 'Do not execute… Do not silently substitute…') that could be tightened. The pinned commit hash 'checked 2026-10-17' is time-sensitive information not placed in a deprecated/old-patterns section, which the guidelines penalize. Matches anchor 3: mostly efficient but could be tightened.

Actionability

Concrete, mostly executable bash blocks are given: 'python3 "$CORE" capture external-plan url "HTTPS_URL"', 'capture plan --vault "$VAULT"', and the dry-run-then-'--approved-plan-sha256 "$APPROVAL_SHA256" --apply' sequence, with a comment explaining how to set APPROVAL_SHA256. Anchor 4 rather than 5 because $VAULT, $GENERATED_AT, and $OPERATION_ID are used but never defined, so it is not fully copy-paste ready.

Workflow Clarity

Both workflows are clearly sequenced with real checkpoints: 'test -f "$CORE"', 'contracts --verify', a dry-run plan whose 'approved_plan_sha256' must be reviewed before applying, 'Inspect the actual result and record extraction limitations', and the idempotency rule 'A repeated identical payload is a no-op'. Anchor 4 rather than 5 because error-recovery paths (what to do when verification or apply fails) are left implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized (product root resolution, inert URL plan, execution-stop rationale, filesystem capture), and the single reference 'Use [operation-transactions.md](../wiki/references/operation-transactions.md) for custom capture drafts' is clearly signaled and one level deep. Anchor 4 rather than 5 because the reference resolves outside the skill bundle and the ~18-line inline policy rationale in 'Why execution stops here' could live in a reference file to keep SKILL.md lean; no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/) exist in this package.

Specificity

Quotes: 'Plan optional Defuddle extraction' and 'retain already available local source files through reviewed filesystem capture' name the domain plus two concrete actions in third person, but coverage is not comprehensive (no mention of reporting, plan states, or capture steps). Matches the '1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive' anchor; not 4 because it does not list several specific actions.

Completeness

Both parts are present: a 'what' ('Plan optional Defuddle extraction and retain already available local source files through reviewed filesystem capture') and an explicit 'Use for…' when-clause with concrete triggers. Below anchor 5 because the 'what' is partially obscured by jargon such as 'reviewed filesystem capture' and 'enforcing adapter', leaving the actual operation less crisp than the exemplar.

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes: 'defuddle', 'clean this URL', 'strip page clutter', 'readable Markdown from a web page', 'preparing a web source for later wiki ingestion' are natural phrases a user would say. Good coverage, but common synonyms like 'extract article content', 'remove ads/boilerplate', or 'web page to markdown' are missing, so below the comprehensive anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The unique trigger 'defuddle' carves a clear niche with minimal conflict, but 'clean this URL' and 'readable Markdown from a web page' could overlap with general web-fetch or markdown-conversion skills. Mostly distinct with minor overlap risk, matching anchor 4.