Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, executable, and concise, with a clear read-only lint workflow separated from an explicitly checkpointed repair workflow. Its single external reference is one level deep and clearly signaled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; explanatory sentences (e.g. the .gitignore resolution rule, 'mirroring Obsidian's own indexer') describe engine-specific behavior rather than generic padding, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable bash commands with the real flag set (--vault, --format markdown, --exclude, --strict) covering common cases, plus concrete numbered steps for explaining findings and performing repairs; placeholder resolution for PRODUCT_ROOT is itself explicitly instructed. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The repair workflow is a numbered checklist with explicit validation checkpoints (record expected SHA-256, inspect bundle before applying, re-run lint read-only and compare), and read-only lint is cleanly separated from destructive repair — satisfying the feedback-loop requirement for batch/destructive operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clear sections with a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference (../wiki/references/operation-transactions.md); no monolithic inline bulk and no nested references, giving easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |