CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

wiki-mode

Read or configure the vault filing methodology and suggest destinations for planned knowledge creation under Generic, LYT, PARA, or Zettelkasten. Use for wiki mode, methodology mode, what is my vault mode, set vault mode, switch to PARA, use LYT, Zettelkasten setup, change mode, configure mode, or methodology routing. This skill does not save content or migrate notes.

71

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, executable skill body that treats mode changes as a reviewed configuration transaction with explicit dry-run, hash-pin, and apply checkpoints. Conciseness and actionability are strong but held back slightly by soft prose in Checkpoint and placeholder paths.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean and purposeful with no padding about concepts Claude already knows (no "what is Zettelkasten"), but the Checkpoint section ("Observe the user's current structure, think about how they retrieve and act on notes") is soft prose that could be trimmed; not a 5 due to these minor over-explanation instances.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready bash commands throughout ("python3 \"$MODE_HELPER\" --vault \"$VAULT\" get", the full "mode set" commands with flags); not a 5 because the PRODUCT_ROOT line uses a placeholder path and the route/config commands rely on externally-defined variables.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The "Change mode" section is a 6-step numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints: dry-run first, record target hash, "Copy its approved_plan_sha256 only after review", then apply by regenerating the exact plan — a clear feedback loop for a destructive configuration operation.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections (Read and route safely, Change mode, Checkpoint) with a single one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference ("Follow the [operation transaction contract](../wiki/references/operation-transactions.md)"); not a 5 because templates/ and scripts are only mentioned in passing without navigation signaling, and no in-bundle reference files exist.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions with comprehensive natural keywords and an explicit scope boundary. The only minor gap is that the action list is narrow rather than exhaustive.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and three concrete actions ("Read or configure the vault filing methodology and suggest destinations") plus the four methodologies (Generic, LYT, PARA, Zettelkasten); not a 5 because the action list is narrow (read/configure/suggest) rather than broadly comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Read or configure the vault filing methodology and suggest destinations for planned knowledge creation under Generic, LYT, PARA, or Zettelkasten") and when ("Use for wiki mode, methodology mode...") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger phrases users would say ("wiki mode", "what is my vault mode", "set vault mode", "switch to PARA", "use LYT", "Zettelkasten setup", "change mode", "configure mode", "methodology routing") including synonyms and mode names.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (vault filing methodology routing across four named modes) with distinct triggers and an explicit negative boundary ("This skill does not save content or migrate notes") minimizing conflict with adjacent note-authoring skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.