Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, well-structured SEO brief skill with good progressive disclosure via real reference files and a fixed output template. It is held back by some concept re-explanation and a lack of explicit validation checkpoints in its workflow.
Suggestions
Trim general-knowledge exposition such as the search-intent definitions and 'Identify what is already strong' to respect Claude's competence and the token budget.
Add explicit validation/feedback checkpoints (e.g., after SERP analysis or before finalizing the outline, verify competitor scores and gap-priority calculations) to lift workflow clarity.
Replace abstract guidance like 'Score each real competitor: Depth (1-10)...' with a compact worked example or concrete scoring table so the instruction is copy-paste actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but sections like the four search-intent definitions ("Informational: user wants to learn...") and generic guidance ("Identify what is already strong") restate concepts Claude already knows and could be trimmed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete scoring rubrics, a fixed output template, and specific meta-tag character limits, but the body leans on rules and schemas rather than executable, copy-paste-ready instructions, leaving some gaps. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step process is clearly sequenced and an error-handling table covers failure modes, but there are no explicit validate-then-fix feedback checkpoints, which is below the top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body points to three real, one-level-deep reference files (excluded-domains.md, page-type-templates.md, keyword-density.md), each clearly signaled and verifiable, keeping SKILL.md an effective overview. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |