Interactively debug source code — set breakpoints, step through execution line by line, inspect live variable state, evaluate expressions against the running program, and navigate the call stack to trace root causes. Use when a program crashes, raises unexpected exceptions, produces wrong output, when you need to understand how execution reached a certain state, or when print-statement debugging isn't revealing enough.
99
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Use when a program crashes, produces wrong output, or you need to understand exactly how execution reached a particular state — and running it again with more print statements won't give you the answer fast enough.
You can pause a running program at any point, read live variable values and the call stack at that exact moment, step forward line by line or jump to the next breakpoint, and evaluate arbitrary expressions against the live process — all without restarting.
This skill uses dap, a CLI tool that background daemon to interact with the debugger via the DAP Protocol, maintain
the debugger state, so you can simply interact with it with multiple calls.
If dap isn't installed (check: command -v dap), install it NOW.
Ask/notify the user before proceeding to install it.
bash scripts/install-dap.shAlternatively, install from sources go install github.com/AlmogBaku/debug-skill/cmd/dap@latest
This tool is open-sourced and available on GitHub, maintained and follows best practices.
Supports natively Python, Go, Node.js/TypeScript, Rust, C/C++, and any other language that supports DAP.
If a debugger backend is missing or fails to start, see references/installing-debuggers.md
For all commands and flags: dap --help or dap <cmd> --help.
dap debug <file> launches the program under the debugger. Backend is auto-detected from the file extension.
Choose your starting strategy based on what you know:
dap debug script.py --break script.py:42dap debug script.py --break "script.py:42:x > 5" (
always quote specs with conditions)--break src/api/routes.py:55 --break src/models/user.py:30dap debug script.py --stop-on-entry (avoid for large projects —
startup code is noisy; bisect with breakpoints instead)dap debug script.py --break-on-exception raised (Python) / all (Go/JS)dap debug --attach host:port --backend <name>dap debug --pid <PID> --backend <name>Session isolation: --session <name> keeps concurrent agents from interfering.
Tip: You might want to use your session id(${CLAUDE_SESSION_ID}) if available.
Run dap debug --help for all flags, backends, and examples.
Reach for a debugger when reading source alone can't validate the root cause. A debugger lets you observe what does happen: actual values, actual path, actual state. When that diverges from what should happen, you've found your bug.
Two strikes, rethink. If two hypotheses fail at the same location, your mental model is wrong. Re-read the code, form a completely different theory with different breakpoints.
Escalate gradually. Start with dap eval to test a quick hypothesis. Use conditional breakpoints
to filter noise. Fall back to full breakpoints + stepping only when you need interactive control.
Every dap execution command returns full context automatically: current location, source, locals, call stack, and
output. At each stop, ask:
Trace causation up the stack. If a value is wrong at frame 0, check dap eval "<expr>" --frame 1 to see what the
caller passed. Keep going up (--frame 2, --frame 3) until you find the frame where the value first became wrong —
that's the origin of the bug, not the symptom.
Example output at a stop:
Stopped at compute() · script.py:41
39: def compute(items):
40: result = None
> 41: return result
Locals: items=[] result=None
Stack: main [script.py:10] → compute [script.py:41]
Output: (none)If the program exits before hitting your breakpoint:
Program terminated · Exit code: 1→ Move breakpoints earlier, or restart with --stop-on-entry.
Before setting a breakpoint: "I believe the bug is in X because Y." A good hypothesis is falsifiable — your next observation will confirm or disprove it. No hypothesis yet? Bisect with two breakpoints to narrow the search space, or see starting strategies above.
--break f:20 --break f:60 — wrong state before or after halves the search spaceWhere to break:
As you learn more, add breakpoints deeper in the suspect code and remove ones that have served their purpose — progressive narrowing without restarting:
dap continue --break app.py:50 # add breakpoint deeper, then continue
dap continue --remove-break app.py:20 # drop a breakpoint you're done with
dap break add app.py:42 app.py:60 # add multiple breakpoints at once
dap break list # see what's set
dap break clear # start freshIf a breakpoint is on an invalid line or the adapter adjusts it, dap warns you in the output.
Stop only when a condition is true — essential for loops, hot paths, and specific input values.
Syntax: "file:line:condition" (always quote).
dap debug app.py --break "app.py:42:i == 100" # skip 99 iterations, stop on the one that matters
dap debug app.py --break "app.py:30:user_id == 123" # reproduce a user-specific bug
dap continue --break "app.py:50:len(items) == 0" # catch the empty-list case mid-sessionConditional breakpoints as runtime assertions — stop the moment something goes wrong:
dap debug app.py --break "bank.py:68:balance < 0" # catch the overdraft
dap debug app.py --break "pipe.py:30:type(val) != int" # type violationAt each stop, choose how to advance based on what you suspect:
If you're stepping more than 3 times in a row, you need a breakpoint, not more steps.
dap step # step over — trust this call, advance to next line
dap step in # step into — suspect what's inside this function
dap step out # step out — you're in the wrong place, return to caller
dap continue # jump to next breakpoint
dap continue --to file:line # run to line (temp breakpoint, auto-removed)
dap context # re-inspect current state without stepping
dap output # drain buffered stdout/stderr without full context
dap inspect <var> --depth N # expand nested/complex objects
dap pause # interrupt a running/hanging program
dap restart # restart with same args and breakpoints
dap threads # list all threads
dap thread <id> # switch thread contextEach stop shows the current file:line so you always know where you are.
Use dap eval "<expr>" to probe live state without stepping:
dap eval "len(items)"
dap eval "user.profile.settings"
dap eval "expected == actual" # test hypothesis on live state
dap eval "self.config" --frame 1 # frame 1 = caller (may be a different file)Avoid eval expressions that call methods with side effects — they mutate program state and can corrupt your debugging session. Stick to read-only access unless you're intentionally testing a fix.
When you need a quick look at a specific line without committing to a permanent breakpoint, use
dap continue --to file:line. It's a disposable breakpoint — stops once, then vanishes. Good for
"I just want to see what x looks like at line 50" without managing breakpoint lifecycle.
For advanced scenarios — hangs, concurrency bugs, deeply nested state, loop bisection —
see ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/advanced-techniques.md.
Bug: compute() returns None
Hypothesis: result not assigned before return
→ dap debug script.py --break script.py:41
Locals: result=None, items=[] ← wrong, and input is also empty
New hypothesis: caller passing empty list
→ dap eval "items" --frame 1 → [] ← confirmed
→ dap step out → caller at line 10, no guard for empty input
→ dap continue --break script.py:8 --remove-break script.py:41
← narrowing: add breakpoint at data source, drop the one we're done with
Stopped at main():8, items loaded from config as []
Root cause: missing guard. Fix → dap stop.No hypothesis (exception, unknown location):
Exception: TypeError, location unknown
→ dap debug script.py --break-on-exception raised
Stopped at compute():41, items=None
Root cause: None passed where list expected.While paused at the bug, use eval to test your proposed fix expression against the live state. If it
works in eval, it'll work in code. Then edit and dap restart to confirm end-to-end.
After applying a fix, re-run the same scenario to verify. dap restart re-runs with the same args and
breakpoints — a fast feedback loop. Don't trust that a fix works until you've observed the correct
behavior at the same breakpoint where you found the bug.
The dap session is usually automatically terminated when the program exits or after an idle timout.
When the app is not closed properly (e.g. you killed it while debugging), you can terminate it manually: dap stop.
d70c9a6
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.