Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured orchestration layer: concise, with executable routing and verification commands, a clear two-path workflow with explicit validation, and clean one-level-deep references to real bundle files. The only minor gap is that the literal formatting commands live in the referenced files rather than the body itself.
Suggestions
Consider including one inline example format command per path (e.g. a representative Spotless/google-java-format invocation) so the body is executable without opening a reference for the common single-file case.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every sentence (the two-path framing, the probe-first directive, the no-diff caveat) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands for routing and verification (`steroid_list_projects`, `ToolSearch(...)`, `git diff --stat <paths>`) with clear decision logic; the core format execution itself is delegated to the referenced files, leaving a minor gap in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (probe -> pick path -> format -> verify via git diff) with an explicit validation checkpoint ('A reformat that produces no diff is a valid outcome') and feedback for the IDE-unreachable block case, satisfying the batch-operation validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to references/ide.md and references/fallback.md (both verified present), with orchestration in the body and detail/scripts split into the bundle for easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |