Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, well-sequenced interactive workflow with strong actionability and a real reference bundle used appropriately. Its main weaknesses are repetition of the don't-re-ask philosophy and references to examples/ paths that do not exist in the provided bundle.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'never re-ask what the user already said' guidance (Defaults, Step 0, smart-answer-recognition, Decision-making principle) into a single canonical statement to reduce token overhead.
Reconcile Step 4's generation source: either add the examples/_skeletons and examples/_fragments files to the bundle or rewrite Step 4 to source all generation from the existing references/*.md files so Claude does not read non-existent paths.
Add a short post-write verification step (e.g. re-read the produced mapper/build file and confirm imports/annotations against the Anti-hallucination checklist) to give the workflow an explicit feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly procedural and concrete, but the "never re-ask what the user already said" guidance is restated in the Defaults section, Step 0, the smart-answer-recognition block, and the Decision-making principle, which is padded repetition that could be consolidated. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete MCP tool calls with named variables, exact build-file edit strategies per file type, and explicit variable-substitution/FQN rules, but Step 4 directs Claude to read examples/_skeletons and examples/_fragments paths that are not present in the bundle, a small execution gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-5 are clearly sequenced with a pre-write Anti-hallucination checklist as an explicit validation checkpoint, but there is no post-write validate/feedback loop for the file-writing and build-editing operations, leaving a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview correctly signals one-level-deep references to the real references/*.md files (mapstruct-java.md, mapping-annotations.md, method-naming.md, etc.), but references to a non-existent examples/ directory (skeletons/fragments) create a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |