Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clear, actionable instruction set for a thin delegation wrapper with a well-sequenced workflow and clean section structure. Its main weakness is redundancy around the writing-plans prohibition, which inflates the token budget without adding clarity.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'do NOT invoke /writing-plans' guidance into one place — it currently appears in the step 3 prose, the surfaced message block, and the Important section.
Trim or fold the 'Why this wrapper exists' rationale into a single sentence; much of it is justification rather than instruction.
Make the upstream terminal-state detection condition in step 3 more concrete (e.g., a checklist of signals to look for) to reduce ambiguity in when to surface the handoff message.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but repeats the 'do NOT invoke /writing-plans' prohibition three times (step 3 prose, the code block, and the Important section) and includes a 'Why this wrapper exists' rationale section that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance — an exact Skill-tool invocation with $ARGUMENTS passthrough, a copy-paste-ready handoff message block, and an exact fallback error string — with only minor gaps around detecting the upstream terminal state. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three steps are clearly sequenced and step 3 lists an explicit terminal-state checkpoint (design approved + spec written + spec approved) plus a fallback branch, though there is no formal error-recovery feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose wrapper under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized section headers (Steps, Why, Fallback, Important) — meets the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |