CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

visualizations-config

Configure visualization location, style presets, and output preferences

54

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./devflow-plugin/skills/visualizations-config/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is visualizations-config in AndreJorgeLopes/devflow

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured, concise, and largely actionable with concrete commands and a copy-paste config example. Its main weakness is the absence of validation/verification checkpoints in a workflow that writes config and creates folders in batch.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation checkpoint after writing the config, e.g. parse the JSON to confirm it is valid and verify each configured folder was created before reporting success.

Confirm with the user before overwriting an existing config file detected in Step 1, creating a feedback loop for the destructive overwrite case.

Consider moving the large JSON config schema and style-preset catalog into a reference file to tighten the main body.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean with numbered steps, option lists, and a concrete JSON block; only minor prose like 'This sets up where visualizations live...' could be trimmed, matching the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' anchor and falling short of the fully lean 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete executable guidance is present throughout ('mkdir -p <path>/{<categories>}', 'touch <path>/<category>/.gitkeep', a copy-pasteable JSON config, specific flags), with minor gaps such as templated placeholders and an unscripted README generation step, matching the 'mostly executable; minor gaps' anchor.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-7 are clearly sequenced, but the skill performs batch/destructive operations (writing config, creating multiple category folders) with no post-write validation checkpoint (e.g. verify JSON is valid, confirm folders created); per the rubric this caps workflow clarity at 3 even though sequencing is clear.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is self-contained with well-organized section headers and no external bundle files needed; it is not a 5 because the inline JSON config example and style-preset catalog could be split into a reference file, leaving minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and on-topic but lacks any 'Use when...' trigger guidance, which caps its completeness and trigger-term quality. It names a clear niche but would benefit from explicit invocation cues.

Suggestions

Append a 'Use when ...' clause with natural trigger phrases, e.g. 'Use when setting up or reconfiguring project visualizations, diagram styles, or output formats.'

Replace the generic 'output preferences' with concrete terms like 'diagram format (mermaid/excalidraw)' to sharpen specificity.

Add common synonyms users would say ('diagrams', 'charts', 'render settings') to improve trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Quotes 'Configure visualization location, style presets, and output preferences' name the domain plus three concrete facets, but only one action verb ('Configure') and 'output preferences' is generic, matching the anchor that lists 1-2 concrete actions without comprehensive coverage.

3 / 5

Completeness

The description gives a clear 'what' but no 'Use when...' trigger guidance; per the rubric a missing explicit trigger clause caps completeness at 3, matching the 'clear what but when missing' anchor.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like 'visualization', 'style presets' are relevant, but natural phrasings a user would say (e.g. 'set up diagrams', 'configure charts') and synonyms are absent, matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'visualization location, style presets, and output preferences' carves a clear config niche with minimal overlap risk against unrelated skills; it is not a 5 because no trigger phrases reinforce the niche, leaving minor overlap with other visualization-related skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
AndreJorgeLopes/devflow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.