Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, lean orchestration wrapper with clear sequencing, validation checkpoints, and appropriate offloading to referenced skills. The only weakness is that the pre-flight file-existence checks are described rather than given as concrete executable commands.
Suggestions
Add a concrete executable check for the pre-flight step (e.g., a shell snippet or tool instruction to confirm code-patterns.md, testing-patterns.md, and architecture.md exist) rather than describing the check, to raise actionability to level 3.
Clarify the exact invocation form of `Skill: arn-code:arn-code-assess` (is it a Skill tool call, a literal string, or a slash command?) so the instruction is unambiguous and copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, declaring itself a wrapper that must not duplicate logic and listing only the orchestration steps it owns; it does not explain concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete instructions (file paths to verify, an exact Skill invocation token, and verbatim user-facing messages), but the pre-flight check lacks a concrete verification command and relies on described checks rather than executable ones. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (Step 0 config, Step 1 pre-flight, Step 2 invoke, Step 3 handoff) with explicit validation checkpoints (block if pattern docs missing, retry/abort on assess failure, no chain when healthy) and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a concise overview that offloads detail to one-level-deep references (step-0-fast-path.md, the invoked assess skill, and the implementing chain) and keeps the body itself appropriately thin for a wrapper skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |