Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered orchestration skill: fully executable guidance, a clearly sequenced workflow with strong validation and feedback loops appropriate to batch operations, and a correctly used one-level-deep reference file. Weaknesses are minor: some duplicated error-handling text and inline content (applier prompt, example output) that could be offloaded to references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and instruction-only — no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — with exact commands, prompts, and schemas throughout. It is not anchor 5 because of minor trimmable redundancy: the Error Handling section restates exit conditions already specified in Steps 1-2 (e.g., "No merged features — inform the user... Run /arn-code-batch-merge first" appears twice), and the Step 5 example findings block is somewhat long. It is above anchor 3 since nearly all content is operational guidance rather than unnecessary explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact shell commands ("git checkout -b batch-simplify/<date>", "gh pr create --title '[batch-simplify] Cross-feature quality improvements'..."), exact snapshot.sh invocations, a verbatim applier prompt with a strict JSON return schema, exact user-facing prompts, and exact fallback paths. This matches the copy-paste-ready anchor covering the common cases, exceeding anchor 4 which allows minor gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-9 are clearly sequenced with exit conditions at scoping stages, user approval gates (Steps 3, 6, 9a), and explicit validation feedback loops for this batch operation: per-finding test runs, up to 3 self-heal attempts with re-runs, per-finding revert on failure, a final cumulative test pass, and partial-failure handling for reviewers and the applier. This matches the top anchor (explicit validation, feedback loops, error recovery), well above anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The one bundle reference (references/cross-feature-prompts.md) is real, well-signaled, one level deep, and loaded exactly when needed in Step 4; the body sections are clearly organized with headers. It is not anchor 5 because SKILL.md is not an overview pointing to detailed materials — the full 35-line applier prompt template and example findings presentation are inlined where a reference file (like the existing prompts reference) could carry them, and several detailed materials (ensure-config references, snapshot.sh, report template) live as ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} cross-skill references outside this bundle. It exceeds anchor 3 since the structure present is good and references are clearly signaled. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |