Content
47%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a comprehensive and well-structured workflow with excellent error handling and clear sequencing, but it suffers significantly from verbosity. The skill inlines massive amounts of detail (spawn prompt contents, classification logic, greenfield context per-role) that should be extracted into reference files, making it far too long for efficient context window usage. The actionability is moderate — steps are clear but lack executable templates for the most critical operations (agent spawning).
Suggestions
Extract the teammate spawn prompt specifications (Step 4) into a reference file like `references/spawn-prompts.md` — this section alone accounts for ~40% of the document and is highly repetitive across roles.
Move the three-axis detection logic and team composition matrix (Step 3) into a reference file like `references/team-classification.md`, keeping only a brief summary in the main skill.
Consolidate the repeated greenfield context instructions (duplicated across architect, UX, and security sections) into a single shared context block with role-specific deltas.
Provide an actual executable spawn prompt template or code snippet rather than describing what each prompt should contain in prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is extremely verbose at ~300+ lines with extensive conditional logic, detailed team composition matrices, and exhaustive spawn prompt specifications. Much of this content (e.g., explaining what each role does, repeating greenfield context loading instructions across every teammate) could be significantly condensed or moved to reference files. The inline detail about what to include in each teammate's prompt is particularly bloated. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | The workflow provides concrete steps and specific commands (e.g., checking env variables, file paths, regex patterns), but much of the guidance is procedural description rather than executable code. The spawn prompt sections describe what to include but don't provide actual prompt templates. The team composition matrix and classification axes are well-structured but the actual agent spawning mechanics are left abstract. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step workflow is clearly sequenced with numbered steps, explicit validation checkpoints (checking Agent Teams availability, confirming team composition with user, convergence criteria), error recovery paths, and user escalation points. The debate loop has explicit convergence criteria (>4 rounds escalation, repeated disagreement detection). Error handling is comprehensive with fallback paths for every failure mode. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references external files appropriately (debate-protocol.md, greenfield-loading.md, feature-spec-template.md) but the SKILL.md itself is a monolithic wall of text that inlines enormous amounts of detail that should be in reference files — particularly the teammate spawn prompt specifications, the team composition matrix, and the three-axis detection logic. The greenfield context loading instructions are repeated for each teammate role rather than being centralized. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |