Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An impressively rigorous workflow skill: fully concrete prompts, explicit flags and conditional branches, and best-in-class error handling with recovery paths for every failure mode. The two costs are token weight — meaningful duplication around sketch context and Step 5 finalization — and a main body long enough that some procedural detail belongs in the existing references structure.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the sketch-manifest capture logic: state it once (e.g., in a short 'Sketch context' subsection or reference file) and have Step 2 and the exploration-phase sketch section both point to it, instead of repeating the field list twice.
In Step 5, merge the two Sketch Reference population passages (numbered finalization actions and the no-draft fallback) into one description of the section's contents, referenced by both paths.
Move the per-agent context specifications in Step 3b (architect, UX, security specialist) into agent-invocation-guide.md, which already exists for agent-dispatch decisions, and keep only a summary table in the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly operational content Claude could not infer (conditional flows, exact prompts), but there is real repetition: sketch-manifest capture logic is spelled out twice (Step 2 sketch detection and "After a sketch session completes"), Sketch Reference population is stated twice in Step 5 (numbered finalization actions and the no-draft fallback list), and the per-agent context lists in Step 3b restate "Feature idea"/"Codebase context" fields for each agent. Fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' (3); not 4 because the duplicated blocks are non-trivial in size, and not 2 because nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste executable for a conversational skill: exact regex ("F-\\d{3}"), verbatim user prompts and AskUserQuestion option sets, fenced context templates (--- BEGIN USER EXPERTISE ---), named agents, concrete file paths, and a section-completeness table for the draft. This matches the fully-executable anchor; a 4 would require missing key details, which are absent gaps here. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-5 are clearly sequenced with explicit conditional branches (decomposition mode, security pre-check, UI detection, draft resume), a readiness checkpoint with a verbatim prompt ("I think we have enough to finalize..."), and a dedicated Error Handling section covering every failure mode with recovery loops (draft write fails -> fall back to in-conversation mode; update fails -> continue, reconcile at Step 5; draft deleted -> recreate from conversation). Matches the anchor with explicit validation steps and error-recovery feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Four real reference files exist in references/ (greenfield-loading.md, xl-decomposition.md, feature-spec-template.md, agent-invocation-guide.md) and each is referenced from the body, one level deep and clearly signaled ("> Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/... for the full loading sequence"). The detail is well split out of the main flow. Falls short of 5 because the ~480-line body itself inlines substantial material that could live in references (the full per-agent context specs in Step 3b, sketch detection/enrichment logic), leaving the overview heavier than the ideal clear-overview anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |