Arness Simplify

Analyze recently implemented code for reuse opportunities, quality issues, and efficiency problems. Dispatches three parallel reviewers (code reuse, code quality, efficiency), merges findings, applies user-approved fixes with test verification, and generates a structured simplification report.

This is a post-execution quality improvement skill. It runs after implementation is complete (after execute-plan, swift, or bug-spec) and before review-implementation.

This is an execution skill. It runs in normal conversation (NOT plan mode).

Prerequisites

If no ## Arness section exists in the project's CLAUDE.md, inform the user: "Arness is not configured for this project yet. Run /arn-implementing to get started — it will set everything up automatically." Do not proceed without it.

Pipeline Position

execute --> **arn-code-simplify** --> review-implementation --> document-project --> ship

Arness-simplify is an optional step between execution and review. It can be triggered:

• By arn-implementing as Gate G3 (opt-in)
• By the user directly after any execution completes
• As a next-step offer from arn-code-execute-plan, arn-code-execute-task, or arn-code-swift

Workflow

Step 1: Load Configuration

1. Read the project's CLAUDE.md and extract the ## Arness section to find:

   • Plans directory
   • Code patterns path
   • Template path
   • Template version and Template updates preference (if present)

2. If the ## Arness section is missing, inform the user: "Arness is not configured for this project yet. Run /arn-implementing to get started — it will set everything up automatically." Do not proceed.

3. Load pattern documentation from the code patterns directory:

   • code-patterns.md (required)
   • testing-patterns.md (required)
   • architecture.md (required)
   • ui-patterns.md (if it exists)
   • security-patterns.md (if it exists)

4. If pattern documentation is missing, invoke the arn-code-codebase-analyzer agent to generate fresh analysis. If the analyzer is unavailable, suggest running /arn-implementing to get started.

Hold this context for use throughout the workflow.

Step 2: Resolve Scope

Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/arn-code-simplify/references/scope-detection.md for the full scope detection algorithm.

1. If invoked with an explicit scope (e.g., from arn-code-execute-task passing a report path): use the provided scope directly.

2. If invoked without explicit scope (standalone or wizard gate): auto-detect scope using the priority order defined in scope-detection.md (pipeline > swift > bugfix).

3. Build the file list from the scope's artifacts. Apply the 30-file cap. If more than 30 files, split into batches as described in scope-detection.md.

4. Confirm scope and file list with the user before proceeding.

Step 3: Dispatch Parallel Reviewers

Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/arn-code-simplify/references/review-prompts.md for the three reviewer prompt templates and output format.

Dispatch three Agent tool calls in a single message so they run in parallel:

1. Code Reuse Reviewer -- fill the review-prompts.md template with the file list and pattern documentation. Instruct the agent to focus on duplicated logic, missed utilities, and copy-paste patterns.

2. Code Quality Reviewer -- fill the template. Instruct the agent to focus on unnecessary complexity, dead code, unclear naming, and overly nested logic.

3. Efficiency Reviewer -- fill the template. Instruct the agent to focus on N+1 patterns, redundant computations, suboptimal data structures, and unnecessary allocations.

Each agent receives:

• {files_to_review}: the file list for the current batch
• {code_patterns}: content of code-patterns.md
• {testing_patterns}: content of testing-patterns.md
• {architecture}: content of architecture.md

Partial failure handling: If one reviewer fails, merge findings from the other two. Record the failure in reviewerStatus with status "failed". Add a warning: "The [axis] reviewer failed. Findings may be incomplete for that axis."

If all files fit in a single batch, dispatch once. If batched, dispatch the three reviewers for each batch sequentially (batch 1 complete, then batch 2, etc.).

Step 4: Merge and Present Findings

1. Collect findings from all three reviewers.

2. Deduplicate: if two reviewers flagged the same code location for overlapping reasons, merge into a single finding. Prefer the higher severity and note both axes.

3. Assign sequential IDs: SIM-001, SIM-002, etc.

4. Automatically defer findings with effort "large": set status to "deferred" and add a note suggesting a refactoring spec for strategic improvements.

5. Collect all patternsPreserved entries from all reviewers.

6. Present findings to the user grouped by axis:

   Code Reuse Findings:

   • SIM-001 [medium/small]: Title -- description
   • SIM-002 [high/trivial]: Title -- description

   Code Quality Findings:

   • SIM-003 [low/small]: Title -- description

   Efficiency Findings:

   • SIM-004 [medium/medium]: Title -- description

   Deferred (large effort):

   • SIM-005 [high/large]: Title -- consider a refactoring spec

   Patterns Preserved: N decisions respected documented patterns.

Step 5: User Approval

Auto-all mode check: Before prompting, check the resolved value of pipeline.simplification from the two-tier preference lookup. If the value is auto-all:

• Auto-approve all non-deferred findings (mark as "approved")
• Skip the user prompt entirely
• Log: "Auto-all mode: approving [N] findings ([M] deferred)."
• Proceed directly to Step 6

This mode is used by batch-implement workers that cannot prompt the user. It follows the same logic as the user selecting "all" but without requiring AskUserQuestion.

Interactive mode (all other preference values):

Ask the user which findings to apply:

"Which findings should I apply? Enter finding IDs (e.g., SIM-001, SIM-003), 'all' to apply everything except deferred, or 'none' to skip."

Process the user's selection:

• Specific IDs: mark those as "approved", rest as "rejected"
• "all": mark all non-deferred findings as "approved"
• "none": mark all as "rejected", skip to Step 7

The user may also change individual finding statuses (e.g., "approve SIM-001 but defer SIM-003").

Step 6: Apply Approved Simplifications

For each approved finding, in dependency order (if finding B depends on finding A's changes, apply A first):

1. Apply the suggested fix.

2. Run targeted tests relevant to the modified files:

   • Use the test command from the scope's context or from testing-patterns.md
   • Only run tests covering the modified files, not the full suite

3. If tests pass: mark the finding as "applied". Record in applicationResults.

4. If tests fail: attempt self-healing.

   • Fix the implementation issue that caused the failure.
   • Re-run the targeted tests.
   • Up to 3 self-heal attempts per finding.

5. If tests still fail after 3 attempts: revert the changes for this specific finding. Mark as "reverted" with the failure reason. Record in applicationResults and testVerification.revertedFindings.

6. Proceed to the next finding regardless of whether this one was reverted.

After all approved findings are processed, run one final targeted test pass to verify the cumulative changes are consistent.

Step 7: Generate Report

1. Read the SIMPLIFICATION_REPORT_TEMPLATE.json from the template path configured in ## Arness.

2. Populate all fields:

   • reportType: "simplification"
   • projectName: from the scope context
   • scopeContext: "pipeline", "swift", "bugfix", or "task"
   • reportDate: current ISO 8601 timestamp
   • reportVersion: 1
   • configuration: files reviewed count, batch count, review axes used, pattern docs loaded
   • findings: all findings with their final statuses
   • patternsPreserved: all pattern-preservation records from all reviewers
   • applicationResults: results for each applied finding
   • testVerification: test run summary
   • summary: counts of total, approved, rejected, applied, reverted, deferred
   • reviewerStatus: status and finding count per reviewer axis
   • warnings: any warnings accumulated during the process
   • nextSteps: context-dependent suggestions

3. Write the report to the output path determined by scope detection.

Step 8: Offer Next Steps

Based on the scope context, offer the appropriate next step:

Error Handling

• ## Arness config missing -- inform the user: "Arness is not configured for this project yet. Run /arn-implementing to get started."
• Pattern docs missing -- invoke arn-code-codebase-analyzer to generate fresh analysis. If unavailable, suggest running /arn-implementing to get started.
• Reviewer agent fails -- merge findings from the other two reviewers and note the missing perspective in the report. Add a warning about incomplete coverage for that axis.
• All three reviewers fail -- inform the user that simplification analysis could not be completed. Suggest retrying or proceeding to the next pipeline step.
• SIMPLIFICATION_REPORT_TEMPLATE.json missing -- if the template file does not exist at the configured template path, generate the report with a minimal structure (reportType, projectName, scopeContext, findings, summary, warnings, nextSteps) and warn the user: "Report template not found. Generated report with minimal structure. Run /arn-implementing to get started."
• Test self-heal exhaustion -- after 3 failed attempts for a finding, revert that finding's changes and continue with the next finding. Record the failure details in the report.
• No findings -- if all three reviewers return zero findings, generate a clean report with summary.totalFindings: 0 and inform the user: "No simplification opportunities found. The implementation looks clean."
• Scope detection fails -- if no artifacts are found during auto-detection, ask the user to provide an explicit scope (project name, artifact path, or file list).

Constraints

• Maximum 30 files per review pass (batch if more).
• Findings with effort "large" are always deferred, never applied during simplification.
• Each self-heal cycle gets at most 3 attempts before revert.
• Per-simplification revert: a failed finding does not affect other successfully applied findings.
• Never modify files outside the scope's file list without explicit user approval.
• Anonymous Agent tool calls only -- no named agent files for reviewers.