Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable multi-step workflow with strong sequencing, validation, and progressive disclosure via real reference files. Its main weakness is verbosity in the verbatim dialogue and confirmation templates that could be condensed.
Suggestions
Condense the verbatim user-facing dialogue blocks (e.g. Step 3 strategy confirmation, Step 6 presentation, Step 7 summary) into terser templates or bullet lists to reduce tokens.
The repeated AskUserQuestion option enumerations (Steps 2 and 6) could be factored into a shared reference rather than inlined twice.
Some error-handling bullets restate workflow behavior already covered in the steps; cross-reference instead of restating to tighten the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and free of concept-overexplaining, but the verbatim user-facing dialogue templates and repeated AskUserQuestion option blocks add tokens that could be tightened without losing clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-ready guidance: specific dependency globs to scan, a structured context template to pass the specialist agent, and detailed per-file generation instructions and security checks. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear seven-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (security audit in Step 5, user approval gate in Step 6) and feedback loops in the Error Handling section for agent failures and unfixable critical findings. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points to real one-level-deep references (dockerfile-patterns.md, compose-patterns.md, container-security-checklist.md, all present in references/) via clearly signaled '> Read' callouts. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |