Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, validation-rich workflow with good progressive disclosure of templates into reference files. It is held back by repetitive inline sections (Agent Invocation Guide, Error Handling) that restate the steps, and by abstract, non-executable guidance for the dev-server start/poll and Playwright capture steps.
Suggestions
Remove the "Agent Invocation Guide" table and "Error Handling" section, or replace them with a one-line pointer — they duplicate Steps 4a–5b and the inline error handling already present, cutting significant tokens.
Provide a concrete dev-server start/poll pattern (e.g., a representative `npm run dev` + curl readiness check example) rather than leaving "Determine how to run the prototype ... whatever the framework requires" abstract.
Either inline a minimal executable Playwright capture script skeleton or have the showcase-capture-guide reference supply the copy-paste-ready script, instead of instructing Claude to "Generate a Playwright capture script following the capture guide".
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The workflow is mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no filler explaining what a prototype is), but the "Agent Invocation Guide" table and "Error Handling" section largely restate Steps 4a–5b, and the model-dispatch instruction is repeated verbatim three times — padding that could be trimmed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is largely concrete — named agents, exact output paths, file names, and verbatim AskUserQuestion prompts — but key operational steps are left abstract: "Determine how to run the prototype ... whatever the framework requires", "Wait for it to be ready (e.g., poll a URL)", and "Generate a Playwright capture script following the capture guide" are not copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The eight steps are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints — Step 4d checks all criteria against the threshold, with a build→validate→fix→retry feedback loop and PASS/FAIL budget handling in Step 5 — plus a task checklist (Step 3) and structured error recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Templates are correctly externalized to four real, one-level-deep reference files (journey-template, clickable-prototype-criteria, review-report-template, showcase-capture-guide), each clearly signaled at its point of use with an explicit "Read ..." instruction. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |