CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

claude-history-ingest

Ingest Claude Code conversation history into the Obsidian wiki. Use this skill when the user wants to mine their past Claude conversations for knowledge, import their ~/.claude folder, extract insights from previous coding sessions, or says things like "process my Claude history", "add my conversations to the wiki", "what have I discussed with Claude before". Also triggers when the user mentions their .claude folder, Claude projects, session data, past conversation logs, local-agent-mode sessions, or audit logs.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A thorough, highly actionable skill body with a well-sequenced batch pipeline and good validation. Its main weaknesses are structural redundancy of the desktop-session and JSONL/audit formats across sections, and inline reference-grade material that could be pushed to the existing reference file.

Suggestions

Deduplicate the desktop-session directory layout and audit-log field descriptions: keep them in one place (e.g., the Source 2 section or the reference file) and cross-reference from Steps 1 and 3b instead of restating.

Move the detailed raw-JSONL event schema and content-block examples into references/claude-data-format.md, leaving the body with the resolution-order rule and a pointer, to reduce overlap with the reference file.

Add a single explicit post-write verification checkpoint in Step 6 (e.g., confirm pages_created/pages_updated entries resolve to real vault files) to make the batch validation tighter rather than diffuse.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is information-dense and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but the desktop-session layout, find commands, and audit-log field structures are repeated across the "Source 2" section and Steps 1/3b, which could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout: bash find/glob commands, manifest.py and extract-jsonl.py invocations, and concrete JSONL/JSON structures covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced multi-step pipeline (Steps 1–6 plus QMD refresh) with real validation checkpoints (desktop pre-check, sampling report, manifest-key resolution, QMD verify), so the batch-operation cap does not bind; checkpoints are present but diffuse rather than a tight validate-fix-retry loop.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections with one clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (references/claude-data-format.md, verified to exist), but the body inlines substantial reference-grade data-format material that overlaps the reference file, leaving a minor organization gap.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that explicitly states what the skill does and when to use it, with rich natural and technical trigger terms and a distinct niche. The only minor weakness is that the named actions are variations of a single ingest operation rather than a breadth of distinct capabilities.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions ("Ingest Claude Code conversation history into the Obsidian wiki", "import their ~/.claude folder", "extract insights"), but the listed actions overlap as variations of one ingest operation rather than distinct comprehensive operations, so it sits below the comprehensive-coverage anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Ingest Claude Code conversation history into the Obsidian wiki") and when ("Use this skill when the user wants to... or says things like...") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger phrases ("process my Claude history", "add my conversations to the wiki", "what have I discussed with Claude before") plus technical synonyms (.claude folder, local-agent-mode sessions, audit logs), matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (Claude conversation history into the Obsidian wiki) with distinct, specific triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 2 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
Ar9av/obsidian-wiki
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.