Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with a clear multi-step workflow and an explicit validation loop. It is concise and self-contained, with only minor editorial commentary and abstract map-building keeping it off the top anchors.
Suggestions
Trim editorial asides (e.g. 'that's the insight the user came for', 'these are the richest nodes') to push conciseness to the top anchor.
Make the source-map construction concrete (e.g. a short jq/shell snippet for grouping .manifest.json entries by tool) instead of describing it abstractly.
Strengthen the validation step by giving a fallback self-check when impl-validator is unavailable, so the feedback loop is not conditional.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but includes a few editorial asides ('that's the insight the user came for', 'these are the richest nodes') that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (rg -l, grep patterns for frontmatter and headers) and clear set operations plus output templates, though the source-map construction is described abstractly rather than as runnable code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow (Before You Start -> Steps 1-4) with a validation feedback loop via impl-validator whose issues are applied before presenting output; the validation step is conditional ('if available'), keeping it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the skill is self-contained with well-organized sections. It exceeds 50 lines so the simple-skill top-anchor exception does not apply, and the source_type mapping is inline rather than split into a reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |