CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

openclaw-history-ingest

Ingest OpenClaw agent history into the Obsidian wiki. Use this skill when the user wants to mine their past OpenClaw sessions for knowledge, import their ~/.openclaw folder, extract insights from previous OpenClaw conversations, or says things like "process my OpenClaw history", "add my OpenClaw sessions to the wiki", "ingest ~/.openclaw", or "what have I worked on in OpenClaw". Also triggers when the user mentions OpenClaw session logs, MEMORY.md, daily notes, or ~/.openclaw/workspace.

75

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable ingest workflow with concrete commands and formats and good progressive disclosure via a real reference file. Minor conciseness redundancy between two privacy sections and a missing validation loop on page writes keep conciseness and workflow_clarity just below full marks.

Suggestions

Consolidate the privacy guidance: keep the redaction rules in one place (either Step 4's "Critical privacy filter" or the "Privacy and Compliance" section) to remove the redundancy flagged for conciseness.

Add an explicit validation checkpoint after Step 6 (e.g., re-read a sampled generated/updated page to confirm frontmatter, provenance markers, and clustering are correct before updating the manifest), which would close the workflow_clarity gap for this batch write operation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean and directive with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but the privacy guidance is restated in both Step 4's "Critical privacy filter" and the standalone "Privacy and Compliance" section, so it sits at 'efficient with minor trim opportunities' rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready bash (QMD commands), concrete JSON (manifest block, session index), YAML frontmatter templates, an exact log-line format, and a directory tree — specific examples cover the common cases, matching the fully-executable anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–7 are clearly sequenced with checkpoints (delta summary before deep parsing, privacy filter, QMD verify with an embed feedback loop), but page-writing itself lacks an explicit validate-then-fix loop, so it lands at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints, minor validation gaps' rather than 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a well-sectioned overview that pushes field-level parsing detail into the real, one-level-deep references/openclaw-data-format.md, clearly signaled ("See references/openclaw-data-format.md for field-level notes and parsing guidance"), with content appropriately split and easy to navigate.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: it names concrete actions, provides extensive natural trigger phrasings, explicitly answers both what and when, and carves out a distinct OpenClaw-specific niche in third-person voice.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "Ingest OpenClaw agent history into the Obsidian wiki", "mine their past OpenClaw sessions for knowledge", "import their ~/.openclaw folder", "extract insights from previous OpenClaw conversations" — matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor rather than the 4-anchor's 'minor gaps'.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states what ("Ingest OpenClaw agent history into the Obsidian wiki") and when ("Use this skill when..." plus "Also triggers when...") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor that requires both answered explicitly.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrasings ("process my OpenClaw history", "add my OpenClaw sessions to the wiki", "ingest ~/.openclaw", "what have I worked on in OpenClaw") plus synonyms and concrete artifacts (session logs, MEMORY.md, daily notes, ~/.openclaw/workspace), matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche — OpenClaw-specific history tied to ~/.openclaw, MEMORY.md, and the Obsidian wiki — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap with other skills; uses third-person voice throughout with no first/second-person penalty.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Ar9av/obsidian-wiki
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.