CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ambiguity-detector

Detects and analyzes ambiguous language in software requirements and user stories. Use when reviewing requirements documents, user stories, specifications, or any software requirement text to identify vague quantifiers, unclear scope, undefined terms, missing edge cases, subjective language, and incomplete specifications. Provides detailed analysis with clarifying questions and suggested improvements.

95

1.30x
Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.30x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Evaluation results

98%

10%

Checkout Flow Requirements Analysis

Structured ambiguity report with severity classification

Criteria
Without context
With context

AMB-XXX numbering

0%

100%

Summary section with counts

100%

100%

Recommendations section

100%

100%

Requirement ID reference

100%

100%

Impact explanation

100%

100%

Severity-ordered presentation

100%

100%

Vague quantifier detected

100%

100%

Subjective language detected

100%

100%

Weak conditional detected

100%

100%

Clarifying questions with options

100%

100%

Suggested clarification per ambiguity

75%

100%

Avoids flagging non-issues

50%

50%

Missing edge cases pattern

100%

100%

100%

38%

API Requirements Analysis for CI/CD Integration

JSON output format with report_template structure

Criteria
Without context
With context

JSON output file

100%

100%

ambiguity_report root key

0%

100%

metadata section

62%

100%

ambiguity id field

100%

100%

ambiguity_type field

0%

100%

impact field

62%

100%

examples field

100%

100%

summary_by_type

25%

100%

summary_by_severity

75%

100%

recommendations array

100%

100%

alternatives.md file

100%

100%

2-3 alternatives per ambiguity

100%

100%

Temporal ambiguity typed

0%

100%

100%

21%

Requirements Annotation for Inventory Management System

Inline annotations and selective flagging

Criteria
Without context
With context

Inline annotation file

100%

100%

Annotations visually distinct

100%

100%

Annotation includes clarifying question

50%

100%

Summary table file

100%

100%

Summary table columns

62%

100%

Does NOT flag defined glossary terms

100%

100%

Vague temporal flagged

100%

100%

Vague quantifier flagged

100%

100%

Unclear scope or reference flagged

100%

100%

Annotation explains why it matters

50%

100%

Severity assigned

0%

100%

Repository
ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE
Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.