Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise instruction skill that delegates detail to clearly signaled one-level-deep reference files and includes a verification checkpoint. Actionability and workflow checkpoint specificity are the only soft spots.
Suggestions
Tighten the Verification section with a concrete step, e.g. name the browser tool/command and what to check on shared-component usages.
Add a one-line example of encoding view state in route/search params (e.g. ?tab=...) to make the URL State rule directly executable.
Reference scripts/scale-svg.py from the body or the logo-asset reference entry so every bundle file is discoverable from the overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and rule-dense with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (explore paths, route metadata fields, URL-state rule) earns its place and assumes competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance with exact paths and field names (js/app/src/Routes.tsx, handle.agentRoute, label, description), but the Verification section ("use the available browser tooling to verify the UI looks correct") is somewhat vague and URL-state encoding lacks an example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear before/after sequence is present (explore existing patterns first, apply rules, then verify after visual changes and check shared-component usages) with a verification checkpoint; minor gaps as the checkpoint is loosely specified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear Reference Files table maps each of five real reference files to a specific when-to-read trigger, with one-level-deep references and easy navigation; the inlined rules are appropriately kept in the overview. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |