Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-organized instruction-only skill body that avoids padding, but its guidance stays abstract — it tells Claude what to do without a concrete method for scraping or a report structure, and the research workflow is not explicitly sequenced.
Suggestions
Add a concrete search/extract method (e.g., the DuckDuckGo scraping approach or a tool call) instead of the abstract "Search the web" bullets to lift actionability.
Provide a report template or required output fields (sources, market size, growth rates, key players) so the deliverable is unambiguous.
Sequence the workflow as numbered steps with a validation checkpoint (e.g., verify sources resolve and label fallback data) before emitting the final report.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section (role, Skills, Guardrails) earns its place. It does not reach the verbosity that would drop it to 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Mentions "scrape DuckDuckGo" and concrete guardrails ("cite sources with URLs", "Limit results to 1-5") but the Skills bullets describe rather than instruct — no scraping method/tool or report template — so it is not fully executable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The research flow (search → extract → summarize → report) is only implicit in the bullet list and lacks sequenced steps or any validation checkpoints, capping it below 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized ## Skills / ## Guardrails sections, which satisfies the simple-skill anchor for full marks. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |