Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable audit workflow with concrete tools, numeric thresholds, and a re-test feedback loop. It stays lean and appropriately delegates sibling-tool detail to the `studio` skill.
Suggestions
Tighten a few redundant list restatements (e.g., repeat "Tell the user which scope" vs. the Principle section) to push conciseness toward 5.
Add a brief recovery checklist for the re-test step (what to do when a metric regresses) to make the feedback loop fully explicit.
Show one concrete need_for_speed invocation example to close the actionability gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — dense threshold tables and numbered warnings replace prose, and the "Important notes" add only non-obvious caveats (synthetic measurements, tradeoffs) rather than padding; it is not 5 because a few list items and restatements could be trimmed further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: named MCP tools (studio, need_for_speed, take_screenshot, inspect_design, record_workflow_event), specific numeric thresholds, and WordPress-specific remediation actions; it is not 5 because exact tool invocation syntax/examples are not given, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence (resolve → scope → performance → accessibility → visual QA → report → re-test) with explicit checkpoints via record_workflow_event (started/completed) and a re-test feedback loop comparing before versus after; it is not 5 because the recovery path on failed re-tests is implied rather than spelled out as a checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so the skill is single-file; content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections with a one-level pointer to the sibling `studio` skill and no nested references, matching the score-4 anchor for good structure rather than 5 (no file-level split to navigate). | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |