Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-sequenced operational skill with strong validation feedback loops and concrete tool guidance. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids restating known concepts; only minor tightening of the Ownership section and a few more concrete call examples would improve it further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and operational, explicitly self-policing ('Keep this skill minimal. Do not duplicate command syntax...') and assuming Claude's competence; the 'Ownership' canonical-source bullet list overlaps slightly with the Principle/'Use MCP for' lists and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Names concrete tools (studio site list, site_list/site_info, wp_cli, validate_blocks, take_screenshot, inspect_design) with specific repair-loop guidance; exact call syntax is intentionally delegated to the tool surface, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 13-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (env verify-and-stop, MCP connectivity, site-running check) and a full validate_blocks -> fix -> re-validate -> repeat feedback loop, plus a screenshot review loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (Ownership/Principle/Workflow/Guardrails) as a cohesive single file with no external references needed; the meta 'Ownership' list is a minor organization gap, and there are no bundle files to navigate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |